Upload the syllabus and get the whole subject as an ordered path with a dated plan across the weeks you actually have — then graded practice, section exams, and review that brings each topic back before it fades.
Anyone can divide a syllabus by the number of days left. What decides the result is what happens when you get a question wrong, and what happens the week you lose.
Upload the specification, the reading list, the past papers, your lecture notes. The course is built from those documents, so it covers what your examiner asked for rather than a well-known version of the same subject — which is where most generic revision material quietly diverges.
Set the hours you have and which days you can use, and the plan lays every lesson out to a definite finish date. Compare it against your exam date. If it lands late, raise the hours or cut part of the path — a decision worth far more now than in week six.
Written answers marked against a rubric, calculations with tolerances, ordering questions for procedures, section exams that draw on everything so far. Re-reading a chapter feels like revision and is not; being asked and getting it wrong is.
Everything you finish comes back for review at widening intervals, and the things you got wrong come back sooner and more often. Learning a topic in week two and never touching it again is how a well-planned revision schedule still ends in a bad morning.
You will lose a week to illness, work or life. When you do, the plan re-flows into the days that are left instead of turning into a backlog — because the usual failure is not falling behind, it is abandoning the plan after falling behind.
When a paragraph does not land, the assistant beside it answers about that lesson, with that lesson in front of it. Beats opening six tabs about a definition and losing forty minutes. Pro only.
Life happens. Miss three days and the plan just… slides — no red, no backlog, no guilt. And review lands right before you’d forget, so what you learned in week one is still there in week four.
Italian by June
Vorrei softens the ask — “I would like”. Voglio is the blunt “I want” a child says at the counter.
Open the lessonHow well did you remember this?
Italian by June
Ciao for friends, buongiorno for the barista — and the five vowels that never change their sound.
Open the lessonHow well did you remember this?
A chat tells you “great answer!” every time. Here a written answer is marked against a rubric written first, code runs against real tests, and a speaking drill hears what actually came out of your mouth.
Your shot tastes sharp and sour. What went wrong, and what would you change?
You tied the sourness to the water leaving too soon and named the right lever. You didn’t say why a finer grind slows it down.
total() must refuse a negative price. Make all three cases pass.
1def total(prices):2 """Sum a cart."""3 if any(p < 0 for p in prices):4 raise ValueError("negative")5 return sum(prices)
At the ticket desk in Madrid. Say each one out loud.
¿Dónde está la estación de tren?
Where is the train station?
/ˈdon.de esˈta la es.taˈθjon de tren/
That’s the one: es-TÁ, “is”. Next phrase.
The six we hear most. The intro film answers most of them in a minute and a half.
It can tell you honestly whether six weeks is enough, which is the more useful answer. Set your available hours and days and the plan produces a real finish date before you start — so you compare it against the exam date and adjust while adjusting is still cheap. There is no exam-date field that compresses the plan for you; what there is instead is a plan that will not pretend nine hours on the final Sunday is a schedule.
Substantially, and not because of anything AI. Re-reading is the most popular revision method and one of the least effective: it produces a strong feeling of familiarity that is easily mistaken for knowledge. Being asked a question you cannot answer, and then being told precisely what you missed, is what moves material into recall. That is what the graded practice is for, and it is the whole argument.
Build the course from your own syllabus and material and it will be as accurate as those documents, because the lessons are written against the passages they came from. Build it from a topic name alone and you get a competent general treatment that may not match your examiner. For an exam that matters, upload the specification — that is the mode this exists for.
You can upload them as material, and the questions the course generates will reflect the style and emphasis they show. What it does not do is reproduce a specific past paper as a mock — the practice is generated from the material rather than copied out of it, which is the correct behaviour both pedagogically and legally.
Mapping the whole syllabus, the plan, the schedule, the re-flowing and the spaced review are free and uncapped. The free plan writes 12 lessons a month, which is enough for a short module; a full syllabus over a term usually wants Pro at $15 a month for 150 written lessons. On Pro, a model provider API key of your own lifts the writing cap entirely.
Yes, and it is one of the better fits: certification syllabuses are published, specific and long, which is exactly the case where a generic course goes wrong and an ordered path built from the real specification does not. Upload the official outline and the plan will be against that outline rather than against a summary of it.
